Posts Tagged ‘Education Reform’

The Rise and Fall of Electives

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Once upon a time, schools offered a great variety of elective classes. Cooking, sewing, shop classes, band and choral groups, agriculture, horticulture, etc. When I was in middle school in the late 1980s, I remember a list of electives so long that it was alphabetized. 20+ years later, I now teach middle school. We have an enrollment of over 1,400 students. We have 80 teachers. 77 of them are not electives teachers. We have an art teacher, a video production teacher, and a drama teacher. That’s our electives “program.”

What has happened to electives? With standardized test score results such a priority, secondary school students whose scores could use a boost (to boost the school’s API- Academic Performance Index) are enrolled in an extra math or language arts classes–at the expense of electives.

Our school’s woodshop room is now a parent/community center. The industrial technology room is a science classroom. The drafting room is now a history classroom. The list goes on. With the “every child mist be prepared for college” mentality (along with test scores) driving instructional programs, we have seen the demise of electives, especially in communities where vocational skills classes are more likely to be put to use for a careers. Our school has seen students go on to Harvard, Yale, MIT and more, but a majority of our students will not attend college and could benefit greatly from trade skills classes. The Los Angeles Unified School District has a high school droup-out rate close to 50%.

Some schools are modifying bell schedules (adding another period to the day) so that (more…)

News: No Child Left Behind Laws

Friday, February 25th, 2011

White Houses to Change No Child Left Behind

On Thursday, February 17, Education Secretary Arne Duncan announced that President Obama will push the legislature to revamp the No Child Left Behind law before the start of the next school year. A renewal of the 2002 law is several years overdue. White House spokesman Jay Carney said “The President discussed his desire to find common ground on the need to re-define the federal role in education, so that it is more flexible and better focused on responsibility, reform, and results.”

Last year, the Obama administration produced a framework that would ease many testing requirements, put a new focus on teacher performance and the lowest-performing schools, and replace proficiency requirements with loftier goals of boosting college graduation rates. The blueprint stalled amid election-year maneuvering.

Many lawmakers from both parties say No Child Left Behind relies too much on test results and arbitrary measurements, and doesn’t meet the overall objective of raising student achievement. The democratic controlled Senate is already working on the law’s revisions. However, the Republican controlled House has many members who believe a series of small measures would be more effective than a broad rewrite of the federal law.

US Supreme Court Rejects No Child Left Behind Case

In 2002, the State of Connecticut filed a lawsuit against the federal government over the No Child Left Behind testing mandates. They asked that either the federal government change the testing guidelines or cover the millions of dollars of testing costs. Connecticut argued that there was a provision barring the feds from issuing unfunded mandates on the states.

The case has been in litigation for six years, and was sent to the Supreme Court. However, on Tuesday, February 22, the US Supreme Court announced it refused the case. Says Andrew Fleischmann, Connecticut state Representative, “While I find it unfortunate that the Supreme Court decided not to take up this case, I find some solace in the fact that we have a new administration that is going to rewrite the law and make it far more effective and sensible.”

image credit: White House and Supreme Court

——————-

Written by Christi Grab, Parentella’s Editorial Director and author of  The Unexpected Circumnavigation: Unusual Boat, Unusual People Part 1 – San Diego to Australia.

Bill Gates and Education Reform

Tuesday, January 18th, 2011

These days, education reform has been a hot button issue. Los Angeles, where I teach, may be the epicenter of reform, but New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C. have also had their share of attention for reforms. The media is fixated on the topic, and an interesting player seems to often find his way into the discussion: Bill Gates.

It’s highly unlikely you–and your kids–haven’t heard of the billionaire founder of Microsoft. His Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation charity has given millions to education, usually in the form of competitive grants. Giving to education has become “en vogue” in a way (and it’s about time). Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, recently gave $100 million to the Newark, New Jersey school system.

Back to Mr. Gates. Nobody can question his business know-how. His intelligence isn’t an issue (he went to Harvard University–but ironically dropped out). He has money to spend, and he is free to do with it as he pleases. He and his foundation set criteria for their education grants, as is to be expected.

What’s caught my attention, and that of many of my colleagues, is what he’s saying about (more…)

How the State Let “The Big One” Get Away

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

The purpose of the California Department of Education (CDE) is no mystery. They make and implement the state’s education policies. These policies are then handed down to localities. Seems like a fairly simple task, except our state is the most populous in the nation, with millions of students in K-12.

Luckily (theoretically), all politics is local. Perhaps too local? Consider this. In 2001, my school was (to be kind) in an abyss. Test scores were low, student and staff morale was non-existent, and the school was the face of “failing” urban public education. A ninety-six percent minority population in a socioeconomically-challenged area, rampent with gangs and poverty. In came the CDE.

For anyone who doubts that the CDE is capable of analyzing and fixing such a problem, think again. A “joint-intervention agreement” with the CDE and the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) contained close to 200 points of “necessary change.” And so it came. After a lengthy process of evaluation, our school was transformed into a winner. Less than four years later, First Lady Laura Bush came to the school to praise the turnaround.

She wouldn’t recognize the place today. As I have written in this blog, our school has been targeted by the Los Angeles Unified School District as a Public School Choice (PSC) target. That designation doesn’t come from high achievement; it comes from failure. So, how did the state let the “big one” get away (I use the term “big one” because of the magnitude of what needed to be done and the following success)?

The answer lies in what I believe is a tremendous problem with inner city schools: staff turnover. Since 2001, our school has had: five principals, almost thirty different administrators, four different local superintendents, and four superintendents. I stopped counting teacher turnover a long time ago. This is not a new phenomenon. In fact, in Los Angeles, there have been lawsuits to stop the teacher layoff process from further worsening the turnover rate–in terms of retention of “qualified” teachers. Surely, the CDE is aware of these lawsuits.

At the faculty meeting we had to discuss PSC, I brought my worn copy of the joint-intervention agreement. I brought it not so much as a piece from which to make a blueprint (after all, it was a blueprint–and a mighty successful one) but rather to make a point: the ball had been dropped. Of those almost 200 recommendations, they had nearly all been forgotten, dismantled or discarded. Well, kind of. It’s hard to forget something you don’t know about.

It’s difficult enough to come up with solutions to many of today’s problems in our public schools. You’d think that a winning formula would be treated like the Holy Grail. I intend to send a letter to Jack O’ Connell, the State Superintendent of Education, will include a picture of Laura Bush, and a big question: how did you guys let this one get away? If Mr. O’ Connell would like the answer, I’ll gladly tell him.

____________

Mr. Franklin is a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District. He is an eleven year veteran and has won District and County Teacher of the Year awards. He was also a recipient of the prestigious Bank of America Community Hero award. Before teaching, he spent five years at Learning Forum, which runs summer camps designed to increase student academic potential. It is a world-wide program.

How Would You Fix One Single Problem in Education?

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

Education has been given some pretty major donation over the past year.  Oprah Winfrey and her Angel Network gave 6 Million Dollars to U.S Charter School Programs.  Mark Zuckerberg, of Facebook fame, has donated $100 million to Newark Public Schools.  And he is urging others to step up and support education.

Whilst absolutely no-one in the education system would say no to a chance to make schools better, these types of donations and initiatives seem focused on one specific cause or idea in Education, not one specific problem that needs to be fixed.


How would you spend the money?

If you were given such as vast sum of money, how would you like it spent?  Teachers and parents have a unique experience of seeing exactly what student’s need, and need on a daily basis.

Some ideas I can think of are more teachers, better classroom infrastructure, more technology, better food or Arts Programs.

Whilst these are great ideas, do they fix a specific problem that impacts every student?

Now can you think of One Single Problem that impacts every student?

When I first heard of Oprah’s and Zuckerberg’s donation I immediately thought of a scene from the TV show The West Wing.  It is the end of the series and C.J. Cregg (Chief of Staff) is being interviewed for a job by Franklin Hollis (very wealthy, influential man)

Franklin HollisI’m starting a foundation ‘cause if I hold onto all this money I start to look impolite.  I want to find a single problem I can attack.  Something which might actually have some kind of substantial effect.  Maybe I should be fighting AIDS in Africa.  Or maybe it’s malaria.  Could be clean air or election reform?  I don’t know.  But my sense is that you would have a unique perspective on what that could be and how to make it happen.”

C.J. CreggA single problem

Franlin HollisIt’s a complicated question.

C.J CreggHighways is what you’re looking for.

Franklin HollisReally

C.J. CreggIt’s not sexy.  No one will ever raise money for it.  But nine out of ten African aid projects fail because the medicine of the personnel can’t get to the people in need…Blanket the continent with highways and then maybe get started on plumbing.

Franklin HollisAlso not sexy.  Well if you think that’s what needs fixing I’ll give you $10 billion to fix it.

Can you think of one problem and a ‘not sexy’ solution to our education system that needs to be fixed?

—————

Ainslie Hunter is a proud mum of a spirited toddler, teacher of children with Learning Disabilities and Special Needs and blogger.  When not hanging out on Parentella you will find her giving the very best study tips and tricks over at Study Skills Mentor.