Posts Tagged ‘Educators’

Educators and Facebook Accounts: Good? Bad?

Monday, January 10th, 2011

I remember when I first started teaching, in 1999, that I was given a copy of the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (LAUSD) Ethics Guide. It notes that teachers should exercise caution when giving out personal information (e.g. phone numbers) to students, and that we should only call home for school related business. That’s all good and sensible. In 1999, I had known of the Internet and e-mail for a good four years. Four. I had a cell phone for about five years, and in 1999 we didn’t have “smart” phones (my new “Droid” could probably wash my car if  I Could  find the correct “app”).

As 2011 arrives, we have a possible Best Picture in The Social Network, the story of the beginning of Facebook. If you haven’t heard of Facebook, you’ve probably been hanging out with Gilligan and the Skipper. If you don’t have a Facebook account, you either don’t want one or you probably don’t pay attention to…any number of things! OK, so LAUSD’s 2010 edition of the Code of Ethics has been updated for the twenty-first century, and it takes current technology into account.

Most of my

colleagues have a Facebook page, as do administrators (and of course students). There seem to be several issues with regards to educators having Facebook (or Twitter or other such sites) accounts: 1) Should we have them and if so, how careful should we be about what information

and photos we post? 2) Do we allow students to be our Facebook “friends”?

There’s much room for debate here. Whomever writes the Codes of Ethics certainly is aware of our First Amendment rights. They also are aware of the problems that can come with what’s mentioned above. I began to think about this when I got an account (about a year ago) and when i saw some photos that colleagues had posted (photos available to anyone) that were, perhaps, on the racy side (more…)

"Your Child Has Been Nominated"–A Lesson for Students, Parents and Teachers

Tuesday, December 14th, 2010

For the (insert huge number here) time in my career, I have been approached by a parent (and often students, too) about a nifty pamphlet they received in the mail claiming that their child has been “nominated” for an amazing opportunity to go to Washington, D.C.

In D.C., they will get to see the sights, visit with members of congress, and learn about civics. Most of these packages include a fancy certificate of nomination, and a nice brochure with pictures of kids having the opportunity of a lifetime. Sound too good to be true? if you don’t mind spending close to $2,000, then it’s fantastic. Otherwise, it’s not.

Here’s the deal: These are for-profit companies. They solicit teachers through out the years for students’ names and addresses, and when the information is obtained, they send out these fancy “you’ve been nominated for…” invitations (I think it’s illegal for teachers to give out student information, by the way). These companies have set up tours, lodging, meetings with elected officials and more in Washington, D.C. and other locales. They are tour companies, plain and simple.

This latest one I got my hands on is from a group called People to People. They offer “nominated’ students opportunities for travel in the U.S., and even to Europe. The very professional brochure even has a picture of President Eisenhower, and implies to somehow be associated with some post-presidency foundation of his.

I asked the student who showed this to me where she had obtained it, and she told me a teacher had nominated her and that it came in the mail. She wanted my opinion–should she do it? I knew exactly what to say.

On the People to People website, there’s a place for teachers to nominate students. I suspect 100% of the nominated students will receive an official invitation!

Now, is the experience bad? No. Is it worth the money? I say no, for several reasons. First, (more…)

The Tony Danza Teach(ing) "Experiment"

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

As you may be aware, the A & E television station is running a new show called “Teach” on Friday nights. It is TV’s latest reality show, starring Tony Danza (of “Who’s the Boss” and “Taxi” fame). Danza is teaching English at a “tough” public high school. For real. Unlike the other reality shows out there, in “Teach” children’s education is

at stake. It’s one thing to have “the biggest loser” because the “results” only affect one person–the “loser.” With “Teach,” many children are affected.

Danza tells us that it had always been his ambition to teach, but he got sidetracked by a career in acting (not too shabby). He is assigned an English class. We don’t know if he has received a teaching credential or has an emergency permit of some sort. The class is filmed, as are meetings with parents, instructional coaches, students and even the principal. Danza also takes on some sports coaching opportunities at the school. While alone, Danza film-documents his afterthoughts about what has just happened. He might be reflecting in the classroom, or at home grading papers, or talking about the excitement of the “first quiz” that he is giving.

Clearly, the students have been told to speak their minds, and that they do. Some praise him, while others have concern about his abilities, credentials and practices. We see Danza laugh, be frustrated and even cry (quite a bit). All things we’d see if following almost any first-year teacher. This is most certainly reality.

I’ve seen each of

the first three episodes and find myself engaging in a self-debate about the ethics of this experiment. Should this be happening at all? After all, I began my career twelve years ago in a tough inner-city school, having an emergency teaching permit and having not yet completed a credential program. In this respect, Danza and I are/were equally qualified. He may even have an edge–he’s a good thirty years older than I.

Knowing that kids’ futures are at stake, I had wondered how good an idea this was. Then I thought about myself, and the fact the school they show probably has a tough time attracting qualified teachers. At that point, I concluded the experiment was ethical.

I eagerly await the conclusion as I find myself glued to the TV every Friday evening (I haven’t been this interested in a TV show since the 1980s). The show was filmed this past school year, and we’ll have to wait till the season finale to see the results of the real final exams the students take. Until then, I find it ironic that the teacher is in reality a student too. I hope nobody fails.

____________

Mr. Franklin is a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District. He is an eleven year veteran and has won District and County Teacher of the Year awards. He was also a recipient of the prestigious Bank of America Community Hero award. Before teaching, he spent five years at Learning Forum, which runs summer camps designed to increase student academic potential. It is a world-wide program.

140 Conference Los Angeles 2010: Edu Panel

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

Today, at the 140 conference Los Angeles, we talked about Real Time Communication and its impact inside the classroom. We had the following panelists:

Sylvia Martinez
http://twitter.com/smartinez

Lisa Dabbs
http://twitter.com/teachingwthsoul

Tanya Roscorla @reportertanya
http://twitter.com/reportertanya

Tanya is a journalist with Converge magazine, a U.S. education technology online publication.  She covers Education Technology and major trends in Education. In response to a question about the major trends she is seeing in Education today, she stated the following:

  • There are a lot more hands-on, real-world learning projects.
  • Educators are giving students more ownership of their learning.
  • Social media has opened up collaboration and communication around the world via Skype conversations, blogs.
  • Educators are stepping out of the isolation in their classrooms and networking with each other

Specific examples:

  • Around the World with 80 Schools project -“It’s not about the Skype tool,” Silvia Rosenthal Tolisano said, “it’s about (more…)

Building Student Confidence: Part 1

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Self-confidence is a roadblock that stops many students from living up to their academic abilities. This will be the first of a series of articles focused toward educators. It will feature a series of activities and concepts which have been used to build confidence in students.

The focus for this first article is a concept I like to call “gems and opportunities.” The idea behind it is rather simple: every time a student’s work or behavior needs to be critiqued negatively, the child should also be reminded about what they do well. I use a 3 to 1 ratio: for every criticism (I prefer to call them opportunities–problems are opportunities for solutions),

I like to offer a students three gems (positive feedback). All too often in classrooms, and in society in general, our superiors (could be a boss, sibling, teacher) often only speak to us when they have something bad/negative to say. While the criticism may be necessary, if it makes up a majority of the things children hear from those whom they look up to/respect/are guided by, then their self-esteem takes a beating. Students need positive feedback, too.

In my middle school social studies classes, I take the time to have what i call “mini-conferences” with every student each semester. During the conference, we examine the student’s progress (or lack thereof). An unfortunate truth is that many of my students get poor grades, and there is ample need for negative feedback. When doing so, I try my best to employ the 3 to 1 ratio. Here’s an example: a student needs to be told that he/she is not doing well on written work. Some teachers will simply say “Your writing lacks

effort and enthusiasm, and clearly you’re not trying.” While the statement may be true, it is not the most positive option. But I find at least three positive things to tell them along with the criticism. “You do so well answering questions aloud in class…you clearly know the material…I’d bet that with a little help, you’d be one of the best writers in the class…and you do so well on tests…I know writing can be difficult, but you excel at tests, you pay attention and know your facts, and I know that your writing isn’t far off from perfection.” I got my criticism across politely, in a “the glass is half full” manner. ”

Howard Gardener’s famous Multiple Intelligence Theories is a useful in resource forming “gems” to share with each student. Every child is smart, in fact brilliant, in some way. It might be smart with numbers or an athletic gift. Reminding a child how well they do in some areas is a good launching point for building esteem and ability in other areas. If nothing else, using this approach will make the educator an ally in the students’ minds. All too often, it’s an us (students) vs. them (teachers) mentality in the classroom. An onslaught of gems will diminish the need for opportunities.

Part two discusses positive language usepart three karate board breaking, part 4 a ropes coursepart 5 leadership opportunities on campuspart 6 parental tools for building self-esteem, and Part 7 volunteering.

————————–

Mr. Franklin is a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District. He is an eleven year veteran and has won District and County Teacher of the Year awards. He was also a recipient of the prestigious Bank of America Community Hero award. Before teaching, he spent five years at Learning Forum, which runs summer camps designed to increase student academic potential. It is a world-wide program.