Posts Tagged ‘K through 12’

The Rise and Fall of Electives

Friday, March 4th, 2011

Once upon a time, schools offered a great variety of elective classes. Cooking, sewing, shop classes, band and choral groups, agriculture, horticulture, etc. When I was in middle school in the late 1980s, I remember a list of electives so long that it was alphabetized. 20+ years later, I now teach middle school. We have an enrollment of over 1,400 students. We have 80 teachers. 77 of them are not electives teachers. We have an art teacher, a video production teacher, and a drama teacher. That’s our electives “program.”

What has happened to electives? With standardized test score results such a priority, secondary school students whose scores could use a boost (to boost the school’s API- Academic Performance Index) are enrolled in an extra math or language arts classes–at the expense of electives.

Our school’s woodshop room is now a parent/community center. The industrial technology room is a science classroom. The drafting room is now a history classroom. The list goes on. With the “every child mist be prepared for college” mentality (along with test scores) driving instructional programs, we have seen the demise of electives, especially in communities where vocational skills classes are more likely to be put to use for a careers. Our school has seen students go on to Harvard, Yale, MIT and more, but a majority of our students will not attend college and could benefit greatly from trade skills classes. The Los Angeles Unified School District has a high school droup-out rate close to 50%.

Some schools are modifying bell schedules (adding another period to the day) so that (more…)

How the State Let “The Big One” Get Away

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

The purpose of the California Department of Education (CDE) is no mystery. They make and implement the state’s education policies. These policies are then handed down to localities. Seems like a fairly simple task, except our state is the most populous in the nation, with millions of students in K-12.

Luckily (theoretically), all politics is local. Perhaps too local? Consider this. In 2001, my school was (to be kind) in an abyss. Test scores were low, student and staff morale was non-existent, and the school was the face of “failing” urban public education. A ninety-six percent minority population in a socioeconomically-challenged area, rampent with gangs and poverty. In came the CDE.

For anyone who doubts that the CDE is capable of analyzing and fixing such a problem, think again. A “joint-intervention agreement” with the CDE and the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) contained close to 200 points of “necessary change.” And so it came. After a lengthy process of evaluation, our school was transformed into a winner. Less than four years later, First Lady Laura Bush came to the school to praise the turnaround.

She wouldn’t recognize the place today. As I have written in this blog, our school has been targeted by the Los Angeles Unified School District as a Public School Choice (PSC) target. That designation doesn’t come from high achievement; it comes from failure. So, how did the state let the “big one” get away (I use the term “big one” because of the magnitude of what needed to be done and the following success)?

The answer lies in what I believe is a tremendous problem with inner city schools: staff turnover. Since 2001, our school has had: five principals, almost thirty different administrators, four different local superintendents, and four superintendents. I stopped counting teacher turnover a long time ago. This is not a new phenomenon. In fact, in Los Angeles, there have been lawsuits to stop the teacher layoff process from further worsening the turnover rate–in terms of retention of “qualified” teachers. Surely, the CDE is aware of these lawsuits.

At the faculty meeting we had to discuss PSC, I brought my worn copy of the joint-intervention agreement. I brought it not so much as a piece from which to make a blueprint (after all, it was a blueprint–and a mighty successful one) but rather to make a point: the ball had been dropped. Of those almost 200 recommendations, they had nearly all been forgotten, dismantled or discarded. Well, kind of. It’s hard to forget something you don’t know about.

It’s difficult enough to come up with solutions to many of today’s problems in our public schools. You’d think that a winning formula would be treated like the Holy Grail. I intend to send a letter to Jack O’ Connell, the State Superintendent of Education, will include a picture of Laura Bush, and a big question: how did you guys let this one get away? If Mr. O’ Connell would like the answer, I’ll gladly tell him.

____________

Mr. Franklin is a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District. He is an eleven year veteran and has won District and County Teacher of the Year awards. He was also a recipient of the prestigious Bank of America Community Hero award. Before teaching, he spent five years at Learning Forum, which runs summer camps designed to increase student academic potential. It is a world-wide program.

Public School Choice in L.A.: Designing a School

Tuesday, November 30th, 2010

This is the second in a series of posts about the Los Angeles Unified School District’s (LAUSD) “Public School Choice” (PSC) model/idea. Click here to read part 1.

My school is one of 33 selected by LAUSD as consistently low performing, and thus has been targeted for intervention via PSC. The school (and the population at large) has been given several bid options. Bids to “takeover” the school are currently being accepted, and LAUSD’s Board of Education will have the power to choose a model (or models) from the submitted bids. These bids can come from charter companies, the teacher’s union, groups of teachers at the school (this would be called a Pilot School), or the current faculty and staff can reinvent themselves (ourselves) in what is called a “comprehensive” redesign.

In my last post, I wrote of my desire to, with a select group of trusted colleagues, submit a bid for a pilot school, which would be no larger than 420 students and essentially be a school within a school.

According to LAUSD, Pilot schools would have greater flexibility with curriculum, hiring and firing practices, and governance in exchange for greater accountability. Pilot schools also would have a scaled down union contract, where the principal would have great power in staffing decisions. If a teacher were to lose their job, they would still be guaranteed a position elsewhere in the district.

As my colleagues and I begin the design trek, we wonder if we’re part of something that may become common across the country–the idea that a school is given greater power over the operations in exchange for more accountability. Could this spread from our district (second largest in the nation) to New York, Chicago, Dallas, etc.? (more…)

Building Student Confidence: Part 5

Wednesday, September 22nd, 2010

This is the fifth installment in the confidence building series. Click on the links for Part 1Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4.

There’s an old saying that goes something like this: “Imagine what you could do if you know you wouldn’t fail?”

Most of us have notions that there are challenges/tasks/activities that we incapable of doing successfully. This mental barrier is often wrong. Board breaking (see part 3), the ropes course (see part 4), and various other activities are designed to show people that the barriers to success are often psychological.

For schools/classes that do not have access or the means to do board breaking and/or ropes courses, there are most certainly other ways to help students build confidence. Every success is a step toward confidence. I think that in many classrooms, there are few opportunities for the types of challenges students need to build complete confidence.

In a data-driven/test-scores oriented culture, success on standardized tests is the most common instrument used to measure success-outcomes. Test scores (a topic of national debate right now) are, in my opinion, not necessarily a good indicator of measuring what has been learned, and they most certianly aren’t useful for real world confidence building. Whereas it is true that seeing ones’ test results can be a nice confidence boost, they make up only one of many areas in which students need confidence.

Working within the framework of state curriculum standards, there are many opportunities for students to build confidence for the “bigger picture.” Another favorite quote of mine is this: “if you are afraid of something, it is exactly what you should do.” Going with this, I try to incorporate into my classes activities that students tend to fear. Interviewing experts, oral reports, working with others to accomplish a task.

For my school’s student body elections, I have candidates give speeches to a full auditorium (600 people). My leadership students take turns doing morning Public Address (PA) announcements (to 1300 people). At assemblies, my elected class officers lead the flag salute and introduce speakers. My leadership class gives incoming fifth graders tours of the school.

I try to give students as many opportunities as possible to work in environments that are often uncomfortable for them. As humans, we generally  like stay within our “comfort zones.” We want to do things that are easy for us, or come naturally. The idea is to expand ones’ comfort zone to include things we used to classify as things we feared (i.e. public speaking, interacting with strangers, etc.).

The larger our comfort zone, the more interesting and exciting our lives will be. Giving students opportunities to expand their comfort zones while learning curriculum is possible. It might take some planning, and it might take some time to properly do so, but the reward is well worth the price.

Read Part 6: parental tools here and Part 7: volunteering here

____________

Mr. Franklin is a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District. He is an eleven year veteran and has won District and County Teacher of the Year awards. He was also a recipient of the prestigious Bank of America Community Hero award. Before teaching, he spent five years at Learning Forum, which runs summer camps designed to increase student academic potential. It is a world-wide program.

Essentials of Communicating With Parents

Friday, September 10th, 2010
Tyneham - old telephone

The biggest change I’m making in my planning for the start of the new school year is in how often I will communicate with parents. Communicating with parents requires effort, openness, clarity, and regularity. Let’s examine each of these.

Effort

Communicating with parents is not in the curriculum and not something taught in education classes. Too often, the only times teachers communicate with parents is when something is wrong; a child misbehaves or is injured somehow.  It is important to work at spreading good news, too.

But teachers already have so much to do. Where are we going to find the time to communicate with parents? Build it in to what you already do. Are you on Facebook or Twitter? Start a Facebook list of parents and limit what they can see. One post a week is all it take. Or start a Twitter account and only let parents see those tweets.

And, of course, there is Parentella. Parentella is a private parent-teacher social network. Teachers can create their private online classroom and invite parents to the class. Teachers can post homework, class news, events, and reminders to keep parents engaged in their kids’ educational lives.

Openness

Communication is a two-way street. When information flows in one direction only it is a lecture or an advertisement, but it is not communication. Good communication is about receiving information or other feedback as much as delivering information.

Listening with attention is a skill we ask our students to master and we have to do it also. As we teach our students, listening is more than keeping one’s mouth shut while someone else is talking and it is not planning what you will say. Listening is hearing, processing and considering what someone else has to say. We need to model it in our interactions with others.

Clarity

Like any other area of human endeavor, education has jargon. I wrote a paper as an undergrad in which I speculated that education in a particular field is merely the process of coming to understand what the jargon means. Parents don’t understand education jargon.

Practice clarity. Write and speak in clear, jargon-free English (or other language you share). Don’t sound like an education jargon generator.

One more thing, proofread! My wife is a copy editor and she catches every error in the notes and notices that come from our son’s school; there are far too many and some of the most aggravating ones would have been caught had the writer just read the item out loud. Trust your ears, if it sounds wrong, it probably is wrong.

Regularity

I have a colleague who teaches some children with very challenging emotional and behavioral issues. She is one of the few teachers I know who talks to parents with regularity; she calls the parents of all nine of her students every day. It needn’t be that often, but it is important to contact parents on a regular basis.

When my wife or I would pick up our son at the end of the school day and ask him what happened he’d respond, “stuff.” He’s going to be a junior in high school this year and all that’s ever happened at school is ‘stuff.’  Parents want to know what’s going on in class, what the class is studying, what’s coming up next, and more.

In the past I’ve given the parents of my students my email address and my cell-phone number, and I’ve left it up to them to contact me. This year I’m going to be more proactive. I’m going to email or call all parents at least once a week with general information about school and class events, also with information about all the great work their child is doing. Parents need to hear good news even more than they need to hear all the trouble their son or daughter causes.

Students are Crossing - Buckman Elementary-3.jpg

When I was student teaching in a 2nd grade class, the teacher guided the students in the collaborative writing of a weekly newsletter. Every Friday after lunch, the boys and girls would draw illustrations for the missive. I wonder if that would work in 7th and 8th grade. Hmmmm.

Enhanced by Zemanta