Posts Tagged ‘United States’

Easter Around the World

Sunday, April 24th, 2011

Easter

Easter is literally a celebration of a miracle. In the year 33 AD, on what is now called Good Friday, a man named Jesus Christ was executed and buried by the Roman government. Three days later, on what is now called Easter Sunday, Jesus rose from the dead. For Christians, people who believe Jesus was the Son of God and Messiah, Easter is a celebration of life over death; a time to reflect on Jesus’ death and resurrection.

Easter is broadly celebrated among the Christian communities around the world. Some countries celebrate primarily the religious aspect, but in many other countries, it has become more of a secular celebration. It is one of the most popular holidays celebrated all over the world and especially loved by children.

Easter in Mexico

The holy week leading up to Easter is important in Catholicism. Since the majority of Mexicans are Catholic, Mexico’s celebration lasts the entire week. It begins on Palm Sunday, the Sunday before Easter when Jesus went to the city of Jerusalem to celebrate Passover. Jesus rode a donkey and many people greeted Jesus by laying down cloaks and small tree branches, and reciting Old Testament bible verses. In many towns in Mexico, there is a reenactment of Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem. Woven palm leaves are sold at churches within the towns.

Thursday it is a day of reflection. On that day, Jesus washed the feet of his disciples (his closest followers),attended a seder dinner that would be His Last Supper and was arrested by the Roman police late in the evening in the Garden of Gethsemane. Some traditions include visiting churches to reflect the vigil the apostles kept in the garden, feet washing ceremonies and Mass with Holy Communion.

Good Friday is a (more…)

How the State Let “The Big One” Get Away

Tuesday, December 28th, 2010

The purpose of the California Department of Education (CDE) is no mystery. They make and implement the state’s education policies. These policies are then handed down to localities. Seems like a fairly simple task, except our state is the most populous in the nation, with millions of students in K-12.

Luckily (theoretically), all politics is local. Perhaps too local? Consider this. In 2001, my school was (to be kind) in an abyss. Test scores were low, student and staff morale was non-existent, and the school was the face of “failing” urban public education. A ninety-six percent minority population in a socioeconomically-challenged area, rampent with gangs and poverty. In came the CDE.

For anyone who doubts that the CDE is capable of analyzing and fixing such a problem, think again. A “joint-intervention agreement” with the CDE and the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) contained close to 200 points of “necessary change.” And so it came. After a lengthy process of evaluation, our school was transformed into a winner. Less than four years later, First Lady Laura Bush came to the school to praise the turnaround.

She wouldn’t recognize the place today. As I have written in this blog, our school has been targeted by the Los Angeles Unified School District as a Public School Choice (PSC) target. That designation doesn’t come from high achievement; it comes from failure. So, how did the state let the “big one” get away (I use the term “big one” because of the magnitude of what needed to be done and the following success)?

The answer lies in what I believe is a tremendous problem with inner city schools: staff turnover. Since 2001, our school has had: five principals, almost thirty different administrators, four different local superintendents, and four superintendents. I stopped counting teacher turnover a long time ago. This is not a new phenomenon. In fact, in Los Angeles, there have been lawsuits to stop the teacher layoff process from further worsening the turnover rate–in terms of retention of “qualified” teachers. Surely, the CDE is aware of these lawsuits.

At the faculty meeting we had to discuss PSC, I brought my worn copy of the joint-intervention agreement. I brought it not so much as a piece from which to make a blueprint (after all, it was a blueprint–and a mighty successful one) but rather to make a point: the ball had been dropped. Of those almost 200 recommendations, they had nearly all been forgotten, dismantled or discarded. Well, kind of. It’s hard to forget something you don’t know about.

It’s difficult enough to come up with solutions to many of today’s problems in our public schools. You’d think that a winning formula would be treated like the Holy Grail. I intend to send a letter to Jack O’ Connell, the State Superintendent of Education, will include a picture of Laura Bush, and a big question: how did you guys let this one get away? If Mr. O’ Connell would like the answer, I’ll gladly tell him.

____________

Mr. Franklin is a teacher for the Los Angeles Unified School District. He is an eleven year veteran and has won District and County Teacher of the Year awards. He was also a recipient of the prestigious Bank of America Community Hero award. Before teaching, he spent five years at Learning Forum, which runs summer camps designed to increase student academic potential. It is a world-wide program.

Round 2 Race to the Top Finalists: 18 States & D.C.

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Race to the Top is a historic federal project to investment in education reform, with $4.35 billion available to support states in their comprehensive educational reform. Funds are being disbursed in rounds. Round one and round two involved competitions amongst the states for grants based on their comprehensive plans to reform their schools and the statewide support for those plans. Reform plans include items such as adopting rigorous standards, elevating the teaching profession to reward excellence, turning around low-performing schools, and building better data systems to inform reform, among many others.

The round two competition is currently in progress. Thirty-five states and the District of Columbia applied for the second round, which has over $3 billion available for grants to the winners. Yesterday,  U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan announced the nineteen finalists: Arizona, California, Colorado, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and South Carolina.

“Peer reviewers identified these nineteen finalists as having the boldest plans, but every state that applied will benefit from this process of collaboratively creating a comprehensive education reform agenda,” Duncan said in a prepared speech “From educators to parents and political leaders to journalists — there is a growing sense that a quiet revolution is underway in our homes and schools, classrooms, and communities. This quiet revolution is driven by motivated parents who want better educational options for their children. It’s being driven by great educators and administrators who are challenging the defeatism and inertia that has trapped generations of children in second-rate schools.”

The finalists will travel to Washington to present their plans to the peer reviewers who scored their applications. After the state’s presentations and an extended question-and-answer period, the peer reviewers will finalize their scores and comments. The winners will be announced in September.

Delaware and Tennessee won $600 million in the first round of funding.

Christi Grab is Parentella’s Editorial Director and author of the book The Unexpected Circumnavigation: Unusual Boat, Unusual People Part 1 – San Diego to Australia. and is currently working on Part 2 of the series.

Real Consequences of Real Education

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Nobody disputes that education is transformative.  Students come in at the start of the year and are very different by June.  This effect is cumulative. Year after year the students grow and develop.  Sure, they’d grow and develop with or without formal education, but could this society continue if all children grew and developed without specific direction? I think not.

Children aren’t the only ones who grow and develop as a result of being in school for six or more hours a day.  Teachers change, too.  At least this one has.

Six years ago my friends likely would have described me this way:

Very smart, but impatient with others who don’t get things as quickly as he does. Edgy; tense; quick to anger; sarcastic. Stubborn, inflexible, stiff, rigid. Disorganized.

Yes, I did say my friends, all of whom were surprised, to say the least, that I wanted to become a teacher and a special education teacher at that.

Six years later these same friends say:

Very smart. Calmer, but still very alert. Flexible. Open to new experiences and way more patient. Less judgmental. Less sarcastic but wittier. Very generous.

What happened?

I changed. None of those changes were planned, directed, strategic or part of a curriculum.  All the changes are the results of tests, and those tests were anything but standard.  Anyone who has read my writing for any length of time knows that I have VERY low regard for standardized tests; they are a fraud being perpetrated on the American by its elected leaders, none of whom have a clue about how children learn.

Unfortunately, as standardized tests have become more prevalent schools have had to move further and further away from operating in ways compatible with the ways students learn.  Students learn and develop the same way I have grown and developed the past six years, the way I’ve grown and developed through the courses of all my various careers.  I was put into situations where I had to solve problems and learn from the failures and successes of the effort.  Even more important, I was given time and help to figure out why what I did was a mistake or success, and, if the former, how to do it better next time.  I engaged in the process because it was meaningful and both success and failure had consequences that meant something to me.

The noted educational philosopher, Tom Bodett, he of “We’ll leave the light on for you” fame, said, “The difference between school and life? In school, you’re taught a lesson and then given a test. In life, you’re given a test that teaches you a lesson.”

More and more it seems we shield our children from life, from having experiences that have consequences, from taking responsibility for their successes and failures.  My great grandparents did hard, physical work and hoped for a better life for their children.  My grandparents did slightly less hard physical work and hoped for a better life for their children.  My parents did more intellectual than physical work and hoped for a better life for their children.  I do purely intellectual work and hope my now 16-year-old son has a better life than mine.

But I wonder if I am helping him develop the tools to do that.

He is great with kids, but he does not want to babysit.  He is big (6’4” and still growing!) and strong, but does not want to do physical work.  When I was a kid I didn’t get an allowance. If I wanted money I had to work for it.  My son gets $20 a week whether or not he empties the dishwasher or cleans the cat littler. When he doesn’t do it, my wife or I do.

Have I failed my son by not giving him larger responsibilities, by not giving him or allowing him to find tasks with real consequences for him?

I’m not talking about punishing him for not cleaning the cat box or paying him to do so.  When I was his age I dropped out of school to work on political campaigns because the election of those candidates and enactment of what they stood for had greater importance to me than parsing Moby Dick.  I was bored in school because it did not have meaning in terms of my needs.

My son is smarter than I am but his grades are worse than mine were even though he attends school every day and I rarely did.  He has grown up in a stable home with two parents that he knows love each other and him.  When I was 17, I moved out and lived on my own to get away from a very difficult family situation.  I had to earn $200 a month for my rent and money for food and clothes and other aspects of life.  My son has gone to camp for part of the summer for the past six years.  This year he is there for the whole summer because he has a paying job, his first. Maybe the $250 he earns this summer as the theater aide will teach him about effort and responsibility, and provide him with tasks that carry meaningful consequences of success or failure.

His parents haven’t done that and neither has his high school.  I think we’ve failed him in an important way.

Has education or the pursuit of it transformed you in a tangible way?

———————————————————————————————————————————–

By Deven Black

Alternative Priorities

Monday, July 5th, 2010

When I was growing up, I pretty much lived for the after-school hours. Those hours were spent in rehearsals. I started doing community theater when I was six and continued all through school.

My parents insisted that I could not be failing any classes in order to participate. A reasonable request, and one I took seriously. At the High School for the Arts, a certain GPA was necessary in order to stay.

My oldest daughter has come close to failing a couple of classes, and yet, I could never pull the trigger on taking away her “extra-curriculars.” They were what got her through the day.

My 12-year-old, former 7th grader is pretty average in most aspects. She’s not the greatest student, she’s not the most popular girl, she’s been a victim of bullying, and she’s battling some raging hormones. What’s more, she knows it.

The only place where she feels better than average, the only time where she feels beautiful, the only time where she feels special is when she’s in rehearsal and performing. There, my little girl shines and is the best she can be.

Source: Wikimedia Commons

When I got the progress report that she wasn’t doing so well in a couple of her classes, I considered pulling her out of dance or acting, but I couldn’t bring myself to do it. I couldn’t take away that place where she felt extraordinary rather than ordinary. She needed that.

The most I could do was tell her that the High School for the Arts won’t be so forgiving. The best I could do was let her know that those activities are a privilege, not a right. I know there are many parents, teachers and others that would disagree with me. Still, I have to look at the long-term consequences; play the tape through to the end.

So what would she be doing if she wasn’t in rehearsals, wasn’t learning choreography, memorizing lines, dancing to the music? My guess is she would spend her time in the Tech Lab, creating fake FB accounts, playing videogames, withdrawing further from the world around her. Is that really better?

Sure, it’d be nice to say that she would use that time to study, but I simply don’t find that realistic. She’d spend the time fighting with me, feeling worse about herself because inadequacies in other areas meant that she couldn’t do what she loved. Couldn’t do what made her feel good about who she is.

And it’s not just about doing what you love: it’s about being free enough to learn, feeling confident enough to put yourself out there. Every performance is a sort of dare. In fact, she was worried when performance time came because she knew that a girl from school that she didn’t get along with would be coming. She worried that the girl would laugh at her, would think she was bad. But she believed in herself enough to do it anyway (and that girl ended up not coming after all).

And it’s not even just about finding self-confidence. She actually learns through these performances. She reads scripts, and learns how to analyze what’s between the lines (a skill I’ve found useful in every English lit class I’ve taken). She learns musicality (a form of math), and dance. With America in a time of a crisis with obesity, dancing keeps her physically fit. Dancing, singing and acting not only makes her a better person, it makes her a better student.

She ended up not failing her class. She pushed herself at the end, she swallowed her pride a little and asked for help, and she found enough confidence in herself to believe that she could pass the class. And she did. Just barely, but she did.

So I’ll take the criticisms from others that I didn’t pull her from her extra-curriculars. In the end, what’s important is that she grows and strives to be better. She did. And she still is.

Do you and your family have activities you are just not willing to let go?

By April McCaffery